On the other side, there will always be those who desire a more quantifiable definition of sustainable design, i.e. the process and checklist of the green building rating systems. And for good reason, in a marketplace where so many designers are self-branded as being “Green at the Core, since 1968″, a widespread system of 3rd party recognition such as LEED or Green Globes plays an important role. We’ve also certainly seen how these systems have the power (particularly when endorsed by public agencies or whole jurisdictions), to accelerate the rate of participation in green building and design, to be an “agent for change” for the better.

In the end, for me both the LEED checklist and the pursuit of the more intangible have a place in the designer’s minds-eye – it’s the latter of course that makes design so much fun.

To continue with your point, I absolutely agree that we need to celebrate our regional styles more. We need to stop thinking that interesting things happen elsewhere, and look at the unique and interesting things all around us.

For example, Quebec vernacular architecture is different from Ontario – even on both sides of the Ottawa River, I notice a difference. Walking from downtown Ottawa to my bf’s Mom’s place in Hull across one of the bridges, it’s immediately, but subtly different – even though these cities have grown up beside each other.